<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where To Find Buyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/blog/where-to-find-buyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/blog/where-to-find-buyers/</link>
	<description>Word of Mouth Marketing = WOW! + Follow-up + &#039;Call To Action&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:44:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/blog/where-to-find-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/?p=26#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I would have thought that Free would turn people off. So much spam these days has that spelled F R E E or fr!ee. When I see it online Ialmost automatically have a negative thought in my mind.
There are 2 headline software tools, one comes from a Clayton Makepeace follower (and I can&#039;t remember who) and the other from James Brausch. I know Brausch&#039;s better but both take your headline and statistically tell you how well it should do against old headlines. Free is one of the words that just does not make it.

love the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought that Free would turn people off. So much spam these days has that spelled F R E E or fr!ee. When I see it online Ialmost automatically have a negative thought in my mind.<br />
There are 2 headline software tools, one comes from a Clayton Makepeace follower (and I can&#8217;t remember who) and the other from James Brausch. I know Brausch&#8217;s better but both take your headline and statistically tell you how well it should do against old headlines. Free is one of the words that just does not make it.</p>
<p>love the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaida</title>
		<link>http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/blog/where-to-find-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/?p=26#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,
I agree that the word &quot;complimentary&quot; would give more value... and it was a complimentary gift voucher we gave to our clients.  We also have a valid date added which makes new clients more inclined to ring up to use their voucher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,<br />
I agree that the word &#8220;complimentary&#8221; would give more value&#8230; and it was a complimentary gift voucher we gave to our clients.  We also have a valid date added which makes new clients more inclined to ring up to use their voucher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/blog/where-to-find-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/?p=26#comment-69</guid>
		<description>According to statistical analysis data researched by James Brausch, the word &quot;complimentary&quot; is statistically more profitable than the word &quot;free&quot;...  It would be interesting to add that variable into the mix, and test the results.

Cheers,
Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to statistical analysis data researched by James Brausch, the word &#8220;complimentary&#8221; is statistically more profitable than the word &#8220;free&#8221;&#8230;  It would be interesting to add that variable into the mix, and test the results.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaida</title>
		<link>http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/blog/where-to-find-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordofmouthmagic.com/?p=26#comment-66</guid>
		<description>We included a FREE voucher in the xmas cards for our clients to give to a friend. They were well received and have already got new clients from these.

I had suggested &#039;New Year&#039; cards instead of xmas cards &amp; why... maybe that suggestion will be taken up this year... we&#039;ll have to wait &amp; see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We included a FREE voucher in the xmas cards for our clients to give to a friend. They were well received and have already got new clients from these.</p>
<p>I had suggested &#8216;New Year&#8217; cards instead of xmas cards &amp; why&#8230; maybe that suggestion will be taken up this year&#8230; we&#8217;ll have to wait &amp; see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
